آنها پول در دراز مدت از دست دادن نیست? من فکر می کنم از هر گونه دلایل چرا شرکت می خواهد به انجام این کار مگر اینکه آنها اطلاعات خود را به فروش نمی.
5 دیدگاه برای “کسی به من توضیح می تواند منطق پشت سر مادام العمر اشتراک VPN?”
دیدگاهها بسته شدهاند.
Lifetime of the company or product not the lifetime of the customer.
So someone pays eg $350 for lifetime, but a subscription costs $100/yr
1. Company now has cash in hand.
2. If company closes after 3yrs, they’ve made money.
3. If company doesn’t close until at least 4yrs, then it represents good value for money for customer, hence, some people take the risk.
I got one like that almost two years ago for 30USD. They worked great for little over a year, then they just disappeared. Servers went down, support was nowhere to be found, … About a month ago they got back, my subscription still works, but the service is terrible: couple of very slow servers. After they initially went down I bought a well-known VPN service and it works great.
You get sucked into something which may be a horrible service.
You will pay more for frustration and then leave automatically 🙂
Probably something like this. Each server costs $30 per year(bare min), you pay 100 for life for a service you may or may not utilize 100%. They then have cash for 3 more servers a year(if they decide to invest that money that way) or run that same server for 3 years. Of course they can simply offer a service that has a hidden bandwith throughput and limit you.