99.9 ٪ از شبکه اختصاصی مجازی بررسی جعلی هستند یا حقایق نیم?

من فکر می کنم سایت restoreprivacy نسبتا صادق و راستگو بود. اما حتی نویسنده Sven مشکوک نظرات پست های خود را. سایت های دیگر را که ادعا می شود خنثی انجام همان زیرا آنها یا دریافت کمیسیون تبلیغات و یا برخی از نظر دیگر برای ارسال توصیه.

چون رباتها و نویسندگان حرفه ای بررسی است که به نظر می رسد به هنجار را ترک میکنند شفاهی از طریق انجمن های آنلاین نیز مشکوک در بهترین حالت است. به این ترتیب، VPN خوب است که اجازه می دهد تا دسترسی به سایتهایی که دسترسی شما محدود کنید زیرا شما با استفاده از VPN است بسیار سخت برای پیدا کردن پیدا کردن. بسیار خسته کننده است.

آن خواهد بود جالب است ببینید اگر پست من حذف می شود!

خرید فیلترشکن

18 دیدگاه برای “99.9 ٪ از شبکه اختصاصی مجازی بررسی جعلی هستند یا حقایق نیم?”

  1. This post isn’t going to be removed. Please don’t “recommend” VPN’s in comments.

  2. It *used to be* that Google helped you find information.

    *Now* Google just tries to sell you stuff.

  3. There are VPN providers paying affiliates 10x the initial month’s revenue on a monthly account. Some of the larger sites are spending an easy six figures monthly on advertising. It is incredibly difficult to compete on most review sites and/or “best” sites unless you are willing to pony up extraordinary bonuses and commissions.

  4. The other thing here is that even if you have people claiming to be impartial, you could still get COMPLETELY different results for speeds, app performance, etc. just because of different variables.
    I’d take ANY review with a giant grain of salt – regardless of whether the site has affiliates, ads, or claims to just get “donations”.
    edit: typos

  5. Another point to remember – just because you are paying for a VPN is no guarantee that you can trust it any more than a free one.

  6. It’s tough reading VPN reviews. On the websites that do it, a lot of them are being paid comissions for sending users to specific VPN’s so they only list the VPN’s that pay for affiliation.

    And on forums like reddit even if the review isn’t being written by a shill you may still have difficulty due to the uncontrolled non-scientific way that the reviews are conducted.

    For example if someone reviews a VPN and says it was great for them but they only have 50Mb internet and the VPN only could deliver 100Mb they never met the threshold to receive bad service. But you may have 200Mb internet and be unable to get good high speed service from that VPN.

    Similar situation when it comes to geographic location. Someone in America reviewing a VPN where they used their American servers close to where they live may review a VPN as spectacular and yet you in Bahrain can’t get a decent connection to any of that VPN companies servers.

    So ya know it’s tough. Obviously noted in this thread is https://thatoneprivacysite.net/ which I do believe to be impartial. They are reviewing many different VPN’s and don’t use affiliate links to any of them and they keep their location and speed relatively constant for each review giving a better baseline to compare multiple providers.

  7. It’s hard. One of the most heavily pimped VPNs on reddit was caught not too long ago with a misconfigured server that basically exposed all their p2p traffic to patent trolls.

    Most of the reviews crowing about “no logs” are, on their face, ridiculous. There is no such thing as a stateless VPN. none of them run like an open relay, that’s not possible. But the marketing race is clear, if you don’t say “no logs” you get left in the dust.

    I assume the mods here are strict about mentioning VPNs because the affiliate money is enough incentive to spam relentlessly. A VPN is one of the few online things people will actually pay for, reliably, month after month.

  8. I need a new VPN after reading this thread I am too scared to ask, but any recommendations?

    I am in the UK

    I was looking at PIA.

  9. Hell yeah, the industry is shady.

    We occasionally get emails offering fake reviews. It’s goes to show that a lot of services just want to make money.

    Rather be a small honest VPN than be a big dishonest VPN.

  10. I can see that reviewing a VPN would be challenging, for an honest reviewer. Complex product that must support multiple OS’s, span multiple countries, multiple servers. Some also have extra features in the browser. Performance and reliability are issues. And a big part of it is deciding how much to trust the provider’s statement that they don’t log traffic, and their statement about requests from law enforcement.

  11. Yes they are all false. use ‘that one privacy site’ as linked by others, and stick to the providers that don’t run affiliate schemes, those are the ones whos quality of service is where their money goes instead of to affiliates.

دیدگاه‌ها بسته شده‌اند.